Hartford, Connecticut ODAR Office

At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Hartford, Connecticut, 7 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in Hartford, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 15.0 months. The average case processing time in Hartford is 436 days.The Hartford average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 40%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the Hartford ODAR office was last updated on 8/7/2014.

SSA, Hartford ODAR Office
William R. Cotter Federal Building
135 High Street, Room 331
Hartford, Connecticut 06103-1193
View Map
Phone: (866) 931-2878 -- Fax: (860) 724-9843
eFile Fax: (860) 548-1600 (For sending evidence)

OfficeJudgesAvg. Hearing
Wait Time
Average
Processing Time
Dispositions
Per Day Per ALJ
Cases
Dismissed
Cases
Approved
Cases
Denied
Hartford 7 15.0 months 436 days 1.9 17% 40% 42%
Connecticut13.0 months405 days1.917%43%40%
National Average:12.4 months402 days2.018%44%38%
Hearing Wait Time: 15.00 months
Dispositions Per Day Per ALJ 1.94
Average Processing Time 436 days
Cases Pending 3008
Dispositions 1979
New Cases 813
Hearings In Person 98%
Video Hearings 2%
Full NameDismissedApprovedDenied
Judge Ryan A Alger 18%37%45%
Judge William J Dolan 19%48%33%
Judge Kim K Griswold 13%45%42%
Judge Sharda Singh 16%36%47%
Judge Edward F Sweeney 15%40%45%
Judge James E Thomas 19%23%58%
Judge Bruce H Zwecker 19%50%31%

Comments about Judges at the Hartford Connecticut ODAR office:

To leave your own comment, select a judge from the list above and leave a comment on that judge's page.

Judge: Kelly Davis
Date Posted: 7/12/2014 11:49:20 AM
Submited By: Danielle Boggs



I guess I seen her on her bad day she was sick and could careless that I had been wobbling around on a torn acl and shattered meniscus and an anckle that also needed surgery same leg for the past 3years unfixed. She told me I was nolonger able 2 do the job I had been doing for 20 years which was food service serving tables or demo samples but I could do a harder more vigorous jobs like laundry attendant or house keeping that included climbing latters and climbing steps while carrying laundry or whatever. I was also told that being manic depressant, ptsd and bipolar wasn't crazy enough. So the bottom line was I worked enough quarters but Im not hurt or crazy enough. May her unwell being is what through her day and mine off or maybe she jus didn't care that I haven't had a god leg 2 work on in 3 yrs.. ooh and BTW they jus fixed my knee this yr and its been damaged and unstable for so long I had to have over 60% of my medial meniscus removed and its not healing well at all so now its taking longer to also fix my foot. So I'll be limping in pain and wobbling for ever. Which will continue to keep me depressed But I don't deserve the money I worked for all these years. I thank Mrs Davis every holiday and birthday I cant afford gifts for my two kids on being Autisic.. SO THANK YOU MRS.KELLY DAVIS FOR MAKING ME AND MY KIDS LIFE A LIVING ****.. I feel like she feeds into the system that allows drug addicts the right to benefits for destroying their own brain for 20+ years never contributing anything but someone who has worked and contributed to the system cant get whats rightfully ours and it makes me sad for our world.

Judge: James E Thomas
Date Posted: 10/16/2013 1:10:38 PM
Submited By:



If only judges had some training and insight into the complex workings of the human brain. Disabled DOES NOT MEAN STUPID! So just because I may have a good vocabulary or I may be intelligent, does not by any stretch of the imagination mean I am not greatly suffering. I've spent over 40 years tormented by demons, nightmares, flashbacks & self-mutilation. And you want proof? People like you don't understand that people like me can't just jump on a comfy, plush sofa for CBT or EMDR and be "over it" in six months.

Judge: Edward F Sweeney
Date Posted: 8/21/2013 4:04:14 PM
Submited By:



Judge Sweeney was very compassionate and fair. I could not have asked for a better judge and I'm very happy he officiated over my case.

Judge: Ryan A Alger
Date Posted: 6/12/2013 6:05:57 PM
Submited By: Been doing this 14 years.



Judge Alger is a very nice and respectful judge. He has always treated my clients with the utmost respect and care.

Judge: James E Thomas
Date Posted: 1/31/2013 2:58:37 PM
Submited By: Aunt Carmel



Thank you Judge Thomas for helping my nephew today.

Judge: Kim K Griswold
Date Posted: 1/14/2013 10:59:30 AM
Submited By: Justin



She hates people and twists words to suit the federal governments agenda.

Judge: Kim K Griswold
Date Posted: 1/14/2013 10:13:40 AM
Submited By:



I do not care for Kim K. Griswald, as she does not care for me. Yes, I have used substances throughout the years, probably because of my condition. My only hope to make it in this world was social security income, and now that's shattered. She grilled me on my marijuana use, and honestly that stuff HELPS me, and I know this, because I'm me. It's 2013, and I just got my decision of unfavorable. Thanks Kim

Judge: Edward F Sweeney
Date Posted: 12/10/2012 8:37:26 AM
Submited By:



Had 3 video-teleconference hearings in a row with Judge Sweeney. Thorough, professional, courteous and compassionate. The only problem was the remote location. The local SSA office hosting the hearings didn't open until 9:00, yet the first hearing was scheduled to start at 9:00. Nothing that the judge can control. He was patient and tolerant about our getting started late because of SSA's new office hours.

Judge: Kelly Davis
Date Posted: 11/16/2012 1:30:30 PM
Submited By:



She is such a cutie, with true joy in her heart. She cares very much about the claimants who appear before her and does her best to get them a decision as soon as possible. We need more like this hard working judge.

Judge: Kelly Davis
Date Posted: 4/3/2012 9:29:43 AM
Submited By: Sarah Davis Harrison, Esq.



I found her to be thoughtful, compassionate, and willing to allow the attorney to direct the questioning. She made a responsible, efficient, carefully considered bench decision, without fanfare or hesitation; did not play games.